Guido van Rossum wrote: > On 3/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> Suggestion: Make this PEP 3001 and start any Py3k PEPs from 3100.... >> >> Guido> I already proposed that numbering scheme. More formally, Py3k >> Guido> meta PEPs go between 3001 and 3099, and feature PEPs start at >> Guido> 3100 (and hopefully we won't have to overflow into 4000 :-). >> >> Should there be some distinction between Py3k PEPs which fall under the >> purview of Steven's PEP and those which contain completely new stuff and >> aren't going to impact Python 2.x code? > > I don't think there are enough dimensions in the numbering scheme to > indicate all possible distinctions. IOW, no.
Why, I expected 31xx to be Apocalypses, 32xx to be Synopses and 33xx to be Exe$(Z(/)"//&&
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
