On 3/28/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like your strawman: if incompatibilities or synergy > don't require it to go into Py3k, let's propose it for 2.x.
Yeah, I think this makes a lot of sense - and we should probably document it somewhere. Do you want this in the Backwards-Incompatible Changes PEP? Or another PEP? Or maybe just an update to PEP 1? Steve -- Grammar am for people who can't think for myself. --- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com