Fabien Schwob wrote: > for x in iter1 and y in iter2:
It would be tricky to avoid having that parsed as for x in (iter1 and y in iter2): since 'in' is also a valid part of an expression. That's one of ther reasons I suggested parens around the whole thing, which would make it unambiguous. The other reason was to try to make it look more like parallel than nested iteration, but it seems this is too subtle a clue for some people. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
