On 4/2/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/2/06, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A quick idea of mine: Wouldn't it be useful to maintain a list of what will > > not change, collected in the discussions here? That way, people eager to > > suggest > > braces and whatnot can be referred to it. > > > > (I'd be volunteering to maintain such a list/PEP/whatever). > > Excellent idea! It should be one of the meta-peps (in the 3001-3099 range). > > Ideally the list should either point to the discusussion explaining > the decision, or provide a capsule explanation. (Braces are exempted > from this policy; if someone doesn't understand why we're not doing > braces they should probably look elsewhere... :-)
There is PEP 13 of which there is a draft that I wrote at PyCon and I am waiting to have edited by Thomas and Tim. That lists ideas rejected for Python regardless of version. If that PEP does go in the Py3K version could reference PEP 13 and get a good list of things that are not changing. -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
