On 4/5/06, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > I have to write my slides for a talk about Py3K later today, but I'll
> > be back. In the mean time I've rejected PEPs 245 and 246 in
> > expectation of something better that's imminent!
>
> Is PEP 245 ("Python Interface Syntax") that related to adaptation or
> generic functions? Certainly they've gone hand-in-hand for some time,
> but adaptation as an idea isn't really going away (just rephrased), and
> the motivation for the formalism of an interface isn't going away
> either. So I don't think this invalidates the interface PEP.
Correct; it's more that that PEP is also 5+ years old without getting
traction. I think we need a new PEP for interfaces, less focused on
syntax and more on use cases and requirements. Rejection of the PEP
doesn't render it inaccessible; I'm just acknowledging that PEP 245
isn't ever going to be implemented in that form.
(And yes, there are other PEPs of which the same could be said; I'll
weed those out later.)
If you feel like writing a new Interfaces PEP draft, please go ahead!
--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
