Ian D. Bollinger wrote:
> On 4/5/06, *John J Lee* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> But how about putting them at the start, after the $? That way, the
> format character can't get mixed up with the text following it. For
> example, $r{foo} would mean the same as the current %(foo)r.
>
>
> This is somewhat tangental, but hopefully an $r formatting operation
> won't be necessary in Py3k, assuming repr() and str() can somehow be
> combined.
repr() (machine readable) and str() (human readable) do different things, so
why would combining them even be considered?
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
