On 4/7/06, Walter Dörwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > An Interface is an abstract class that you subclass to make it a > concrete implementation.
That's not the view of most people who use the word interface these days. Not in Zope (see Fred Drake's post), not in Java. > If you have an adapter that adapts to the > FooInterface why shouldn't it return a FooInterface object? Because implementing an interface and extending a class are separate concepts. Did you forget duck typing? Something can be a sequence without subclassing a common base class. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
