Personally I don't care what you call it. If you demean it because you disagree, you might as well fore go the whole issue of typing arguments. After all why turn Python in Cobol?
C. G. Georg Brandl wrote: > Chaz. wrote: >> If you are going this far, why not also support a throws() modifier (or >> whatever you might call it). >> >> Right now I do something like: >> >> @throws(IOError) >> def foo(...) : >> >> as a way to indicate that foo() can throw a specific exception. >> >> I might suggest >> >> def foo(...) throws(...) : > > Oh, and as we go, we could require that code that calls such a function > explicitly handles that exceptions. > > Changing the language's name to Javthon seems favorable, too ;) > > Georg > > _______________________________________________ > Python-3000 mailing list > Python-3000@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/eprparadocs%40gmail.com > _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
