On 4/17/06, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > Inlining code obviously addresses this, but that's often > > killing code structure. > Would automated inlining be a legitimate use for > ast-hacking? To keep the same semantics, you need some notification that the (real version of the) inlined code just got modified. Which again calls for namespaces as slightly different from dictionaries. (Perahps with warnings even now if a module is modified after the initialization is "completed".) Making this change at strictly the python level is a bit of a pain, because modules and classes are evaluated in a standard dictionary (from PyDictNew), before calling the metaclass. I don't see any reason it would need to wait for python 3. -jJ _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
