Guido van Rossum wrote: > On 4/18/06, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Would automated inlining be a legitimate use for ast-hacking? > > Perhaps, if you can do it in a way that it also works for IronPython > and Jython... Would automatically falling back on non-inlining be acceptable if suitable ast support was not available? > Though anything for which you can't come up with a better word than > "hacking" probably oughtn't be in the language spec. :-) Hmmm... all right, "automatic transparent compile-time code rewriting", then. Or "throatwarbling" for short. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
