Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Regarding the syntax, IMO *if* we use this we should do it so that you can
> write
>
> super.foobar(args)
I was thinking of something like
__super__.foobar(self, args)
i.e. __super__ would just do the work of finding the appropriate
unbound method. This would make using __super__ more like an
ordinary inherited call, and in the case where you only have
one base class, __super__ is a drop-in replacement for the
name of the base class.
And __super__ could just be super if you're happy to have
a new keyword:
super.foobar(self, args)
--
Greg
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
