On 4/19/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... I'll be perfectly happy to leave the matter (and the mailing list) at that - once said that your complete wording left an unfortunate doubt : it maybe reflects my failure to adjust the subject of the thread to a proposal and examples that hadn't as main/only target, equivalents to reduce().
> I haven't seen any convincing argument showing that this feature is > useful or that the code becomes more readable when this feature is > used [...] BTW, what about replacing the geeky and arguably lengthy keyword "lambda" with either : given - much clearer and slightly more concise; or ? - slightly clearer and much more concise ? <ducks> Boris Borcic -- assert "304" in "340343", "P424D15E M15M47CH" _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
