"Josiah Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > It seems you are right (I was paying attention, but apparently to the > wrong stuff); after going through most of the py3k list history, those > changes that would have been backwards compatible were basically > rejected.
That is because numerous more-or-less non-controversial code-breaking changes have already been approved and listed in PEP 3100 http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3100/ many before this list started. Now we are more thoroughly discussing and getting pronouncements on things not approved before. Terry Jan Reedy _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
