Brett Cannon wrote:
> I just know this is going to fall under Guido's "code first, then we
> consider" rule.  The GIL is not currently going to go anywhere without
> a thorough rearchitecture of the interpreter and that is not planned
> for Python 3000.  Plus most people here, based on the last time this
> came up, did not feel like the GIL was that big of a problem.  A good
> IPC/RPC mechanism would be much more appreciated.

IPC/RPC would be an great Summer of Code project, if there was a mentor 
interested.


-- 
Ian Bicking  /  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  /  http://blog.ianbicking.org
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to