Brett Cannon wrote: > I just know this is going to fall under Guido's "code first, then we > consider" rule. The GIL is not currently going to go anywhere without > a thorough rearchitecture of the interpreter and that is not planned > for Python 3000. Plus most people here, based on the last time this > came up, did not feel like the GIL was that big of a problem. A good > IPC/RPC mechanism would be much more appreciated.
IPC/RPC would be an great Summer of Code project, if there was a mentor interested. -- Ian Bicking / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://blog.ianbicking.org _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
