Let me just add that Andy is wasting his time. Python 3000 won't have continuations.
On 4/20/06, Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andy Sy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Err... thank you once again for being redundant, reiterating what is > > already pretty much dead clear to everyone and saying nothing new > > in general. > > And yet, here I notice that you've still not described a syntax or its > execution semantics. Instead you've chosen to spend your time insulting > me. Please continue, I'm sure it will make people want to read your > future posts all the more. > > > Ultimately, Guido is the judge of what is or is not Pythonic. Without a > description of what you want, no one can be for or against it, and > ultimately, you are playing yourself to be very much like every other > first-poster in python-dev or python-3000; 'I think Python would be > better with feature/syntax/language construct X'. This is not a mortal > sin. > > I think it's about time to use a Tim Peters inspired closing. > > to-inattentive-to-really-be-insulted-ly y'rs - Josiah > > _______________________________________________ > Python-3000 mailing list > Python-3000@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
