Le samedi 22 avril 2006 à 16:17 +0100, Guido van Rossum a écrit :
> Groovy has a different approach that doesn't blend the two syntaxes,
> but rather gives you more native syntax for constructing DOM trees (or
> event streams; it wasn't clear from the description I saw today). That
> makes perhaps more sense; it avoids the lexical ambiguities and a
> parentheses-based syntax is easier to type than XML. Maybe this
> example (which I am making up) suffices:
>
> frag1 = element["some content"]
>
> frag2 = element["some content",
> child(attribute='value')["spam & egg"]]
You might want to take a look at CDuce.
It is a functional language dedicated to transformation of XML
documents. It has a powerful typing system (including structural pattern
matching), and also features a clever syntax for representing XML
fragments in-code.
Here is a simplified example from the tutorial :
let parents : ParentBook =
<parentbook>[
<person gender="F">[
<name>"Clara"
<children>[
<person gender="M">[
<name>"Pål André"
<children>[]
]
]
<email>"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<tel>"314-1592654"
]
<person gender="M">[
<name>"Bob"
<tel kind="work">"271828"
<tel kind="home">"66260"
]
]
http://www.cduce.org/tutorial.html
Regards
Antoine.
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
