Ivan Krstic <krstic <at> fas.harvard.edu> writes: > Talin wrote: > > Anyway, I wanted to throw this out there for discussion. I'm mainly > > interested in a discussion of ways that we could facilitate > > additional metaprogramming in Python, with the tiniest possible changes > > to the language > > PEP 3099 contains Guido's explicit pronouncement against this, from what > I can tell. If this were not so, the defop approach that Logix already > implements for Python (http://www.livelogix.net/logix/intro.html) would > be a neat macro facility to evaluate.
I may be guilty of "BDFL-lawyering" here, but I believe that what I am talking about falls outside of the 3099 prohibition. Of course, if Guido wants to expand that prohibition to cover the subject, I won't gripe (much) :) Specifically, I am *not* talking about programmable syntax, or completely changing the execution model of Python, or anything of that nature. -- Talin _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
