Guido van Rossum wrote:
> OTOH mathematicians (whether in high school or not) write things like
> {x | 2 < x < 10}, which is of course the origin of our list
> comprehensions and generator expressions. Therefor I think it makes
> sense that {F(x) for x in S if P(x)}, ough to be valid syntax if we
> support {1, 2, 3} -- IOW the form {<genexp>} should mean the same as
> set(<genexp>).
So then we'd have list comprehensions and set comprehensions, but no
dict-comprehensions? Or was the intention to introduce one of the
previously rejected dict-comprehension syntaxes?
STeVe
--
Grammar am for people who can't think for myself.
--- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
