I think perhaps I'm the the only one who's missing the big joke. At any rate, I'm going to go ahead and speak up: The Emperor Has No Cloths!
Adding a literal notation for sets may or may not be a good idea (it's certainly not *necessary*). Adding a literal notation for every built-in data structure (or every possible data structure) is completely batty. REMOVING the literal notation for tuples, lists, or dicts is also completely batty. No, I retract that... it's quite sensible, but it's just not Python. Python has simple literal syntax for lists, tuples, and dicts. That's one of the key ideas that makes it Python. -- Michael Chermside PS: Sorry about spoiling the joke. _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
