Ivan Krstic wrote:
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> I think I'm a convert - +1 for set literals, with {/} for the empty set.
>
> I'm +1 on set literals, but -1 on {/} for the empty set. I much prefer
> set() -- {/} seems too Perlesque and magical-looking.
I could certainly live with set(). The ASCII-art phi might be trying to be
overly cute :)
> I don't think we
> have three subsequent punctuation marks as an atom anywhere else in
> Python, do we? (Except for """, but those are three of the same, so it
> doesn't look that strange to me.)
... is the only other atom I can think of. Although there's always siht[::-1] :)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
