> > Greg Wilson: > > I'd like to say: > > x = 123 and x's value will never ever change > > Opens up lots of optimization possibilities, and makes code much safer.
> Jim Jewett: > So now were back to looking for a const marker. Greg Wilson: Yep. But I'm happy to stick to arguing about set literals... ;-) > Do you want to limit it to literals, or do you want to also say > (magic constant) x = y > meaning that x is bound do the current value of y? I know, I know: "const type * p" vs. "type const * p"... *sigh* Thanks, Greg _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
