Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the interests of keeping it small (both in terms of API > and code size) I don't consider it vital to provide a huge > number of widgets. I'd rather have a compact library with > 10 well-chosen generally-useful widgets that I can build on, > than a bloated one with 500 highly specialised widgets. > (Okay, so 500 is an exaggeration, but someone mentioned > 100 widgets. I flatly disbelieve that anyone *needs* 100 > widgets for even the most demanding application.)
You may very well be referring to me. I mentioned that people who were considering PyGUI as the 'de-facto' standard for Python GUI libraries take a wander through the wxPython demo to see what a generally fully-featured library offers. I also mentioned that while I didn't think that a standard library module would necessarily need to include all of those widgets (or their equivalent), "there are literally dozens of widgets that people would be disappointed if they couldn't have." - Josiah _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
