[Guido] > > You seem to be still under the influence of the type-safety mafia, who > > want to make you believe that with enough type-checking you can > > prevent all bugs (though they don't believe it themselves).
[Talin, quoetd by Guido] > >> I think that I agree with the gist of Tomer's point. [Guido responds] > >Well, to most of us it's far from clear what he's trying to say... [Tomer] > no, i'm quite the opposite in fact. i want a type-less language. sure, > builtin types like int/str/float need some concrete distinction, but apart > from those, all language-level objects should be typeless. Well, sorry, but I don't think anyone here understands what you mean by "typeless" so I think continuing this discussion is rather pointless. Your statement that "an object's type is its MRO" is also meaningless and not rooted in fact. And your examples are incomprehensible. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com