On 5/11/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think I'm more comfortable with a maximal taxonomy. In a maximal > taxonomy, I'd describe a large set of invariants, attributes, > behavior, etc., and say e.g. "this is how a file behaves". A > particular class can then claim to be a file by explicitly declaring > this (how that's spelled is a different issue -- it doesn't need to be > done by inheritance from an abstract base class or interface, it could > also be an arbitrary property, agreed upon by convention, or an > external registry of all file types, for example).
If the route chosen is "agreed upon by convention" what is the difference between this and duck typing? Are the "claim" and "convention" anything more than comments in the code? Mike _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
