"tomer filiba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/17/06, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And I brought this up with Guido once and he was not enthusiastic > > about it. Basically, keep exceptions simple. They are important > > and basic enough to keep it simple. If you want fancier support, > > subclass Exception and add the support you want. > > well, if guido pronounced on it than i guess it's settled, but why do you > condsider *args to be simple and **kwargs not as simple? don't you > think "ex.filename" is simpler/clearer than "ex[1]"?
>From what I understand of Brett's post, ex[1] won't be available anymore either. While it would be convenient for inspecting exceptions when they are caught via ex.attr, creating exceptions with keyword arguments seems like it would be a bit if a pain. - Josiah _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
