On 5/19/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK; for the return value (only) the Function().returns(<type>) > notation does look fairly pretty. > > I presume that return(int, int) is the same as return((int, int))?
It is. > Weren't we going to write a tuple of two ints as tuple[int, int] > though? Is (int, int) now just an alias for that or does it have a > different meaing? I think that returns() is smart enough to know that "returns((int, int))" is the same as "returns(int, int)". It will know to do something similar for "returns(tuple[int, int])". Collin Winter _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
