Travis E. Oliphant wrote: > I'm sorry to interrupt the resting, but I just wanted to remind > everybody that Numerical computing people would still like a way to > distinguish between "element-by-element" multiplication and tensor > contraction (matrix multiplication).
A while back, there was talk of adding @ as a matrix multiplication operator. What's the thought on that nowadays? Note that this wouldn't come under the head of an "undefined operator", because it would be implemented in the core as doing matrix multiplication on sequences of sequences. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com