On 5/31/06, Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now that I have sufficiently specified, please explain to me how a new > syntax would improve the current situation?
If you have read past the first paragraph in my previous post you would see the answer to your question: """ I think we both agree that adding a keyword would just allow "promise (lambda: ...)" be contracted to "lazy: ...". """ I am not advocating for the new syntax. I was simply explaining the difference between a promise and a lambda expression. _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
