On 7/9/06, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For an expert user, I don't think "outermost possible > function object" is substantially harder to grasp than > "immediately enclosing function object".
I'm not getting through here. I think it is harder to debug because now you have to take into account the scopes of all cases, which may mean inspecting a lot of code. I'm just going to make an executive decision here to end the discussion. IMO the number of times that your proposal produces better results than mine is so small that it's not worth the complexity. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
