Raymond Hettinger wrote: > I'm curious as to whether people will find one-type-with-two-purposes > easier to learn that what we have now.
we haven't had that for long, and I cannot recall anyone being puzzled by the fact that you can use a dictionary of (item, None) pairs to efficiently represent a set. </F> _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
