On Jul 19, 2006, at 6:31 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > On 7/18/06, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Andrew Koenig wrote: >> >>> I am uncomfortable about exposing the implementation this way, if >>> only >>> because it would require fixing the equivalence between callable >>> () and >>> hasattr(obj, '__call__') for all time. >> >> I don't see anything bad about fixing that equivalence. >> I regard the fact that it *wasn't* fixed before as a >> language design bug that Py3k will hopefully fix. > > I seem to recall fixing it. Are there still callable objects without a > __call__ attribute?
Classic classes? Python 2.5b2 (r25b2:50570, Jul 11 2006, 09:46:24) [GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5341)] on darwin Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> class O: pass ... >>> O.__call__ Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> AttributeError: class O has no attribute '__call__' >>> Ronald > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) > _______________________________________________ > Python-3000 mailing list > Python-3000@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/ > ronaldoussoren%40mac.com _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
