On 7/27/06, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > So how about we change callable() and add hashable(), iterable() and
> > whatever else makes sense so that these all become like this:
> >
> > def callable(x):
> > return getattr(x, "__call__", None) is not None
>
> This *still* doesn't fully solve the problem in the case
> of __hash__, since a container may be unhashable due to
> its contents, even if it has a __hash__ method itself.
For that matter, it doesn't solve the problem for __call__ or __iter__
either since they could also raise TypeErrors. Any of these
method-checking approaches can only tell you if an object *doesn't*
support operation X. Their return values should really be read as:
False -- definitely doesn't support operation X
True -- could possibly support operation X
Maybe we should reverse the polarity and rename them to
isdefinitelynotcallable(), isdefinitelynotiterable(), etc.? ;-)
STeVe
--
I'm not *in*-sane. Indeed, I am so far *out* of sane that you appear a
tiny blip on the distant coast of sanity.
--- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
