Steven Bethard wrote:
> If object.__hash__() disappeared, the hash(obj) versions would fail,
> but the same results seem to be available as hash(id(obj)).
Not in Jython - Jython's id() is expensive so the default hash() doesn't use it.
Last time the idea of getting rid of object.__hash__() came up, Guido
eventually killed the idea because nobody could come up with an acceptable
alternate spelling for the default hash.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
