> From a code style perspective, I've always felt that the magical > __underscore__ names should not be referred to ouside of the class > implementing those names. The double underscores are an indication that > this method or property is in most normal use cases referred to > implicitly by use rather than explicitly by name; Thus str() invokes > __str__ and so on.
Haven't we seen this argument somewhere before? :-) (needless to say, I'm in agreement with it in this context too) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
