On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:31:31 -0700, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >After thinking about it some more, IMO for most purposes ctypes is >really quite sub-optimal. I think it would make more sense to work on >Parrot support for Python. Sure, in the short term ctypes is more >practical than Parrot -- in its most recent incarnation, the latter >doesn't even list Python as a supported language -- a regression from >last year when Python support was among the best. But in the long >term, Parrot (like .NET or Jython do in other contexts) offers >cross-language interoperability, and perhaps even (like .NET and >Jython) automatic generation of wrappers. >
This is a joke, right? Jean-Paul _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
