+1 On 8/14/06, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Georg Brandl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Guido van Rossum wrote: > >> Implementation Language > >> ================== > >> > >> Python 3000 will be implemented in C, and the implementation will be > >> derived as an evolution of the Python 2 code base. This reflects my > >> views (which I share with Joel Spolsky) on the dangers of complete > >> rewrites. Since Python 3000 as a language is a relatively mild > >> improvement on Python 2, we can gain a lot by not attempting to > >> reimplement the language from scratch. I am not against parallel > >> from-scratch implementation efforts, but my own efforts will be > >> directed at the language and implementation that I know best. > > > > I had already added something to PEP 3099, but if you like that approach > > better, I'll add that to PEP 3000. > > Please add this. It clearly says what and why and will answer questions > that are sure to come. I would leave a comment in 3099 also. > > tjr > > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-3000 mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/guido%40python.org >
-- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
