On 8/15/06, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Personally, I thought Guido's original proposal for function annotations, > which included a __typecheck__ operator that was replaceable on a > per-module basis (and defaulted to a no-op), was the perfect thing -- > neither too much semantics nor too-little. I'd like to have it back, > please. :)
I'd be perfectly happy to go back to talking about "type annotations", rather than the more general "function annotations", especially since most of the discussion thus far has been about how to multiple things with annotations at the same time. Restricting annotations to type information would be fine by me. Collin Winter _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
