On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 08:18:03AM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> That's too narrow a view on the language.
I narrowed it by purpose for this discussion.
> Surely the built-in types
> (especially those with direct compiler support, like literal
> notations) are part of the language.
And still I believe they are two different markets, and you cannot trade
features between them. I am sure it would be hard to by space for new
language (in that narrow sense) features by removing methods from the
standard types.
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
