Sounds like a great 2.6 project. Beware of things that are
intentionally different between platforms of course!

--Guido

On 8/25/06, Jack Diederich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While checking find() uses in the stdlib I noticed that the various
> path modules have duplicate code and docstrings for some generic path
> manipulations.  Delightfully they even have different implementations
> and docstrings for identical functions. splitext() is a great bad
> example - os2emxpath.splitext() builds up strings by doing char-by-char
> concatenations where everyone else uses find() + slice.
>
> If there are no objections I'll move these into a module named
> genericpath.py and change the others to do
>
> from genericpath import func1, func2, funcN
>
> where applicable.
>
> So, any objections? Should it be a 2.6 backport too?
>
> -Jack
> _______________________________________________
> Python-3000 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
> Unsubscribe: 
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/guido%40python.org
>


-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to