A couple Python-3000 threads [1] [2] have indicated that the most natural use of zip() is with sequences of the same lengths. I feel the same way, and run into this all the time. Because the error would otherwise pass silently, I usually end up adding checks before each use of zip() to raise an exception if I accidentally pass in sequences of different lengths.
Any chance that zip() in Python 3000 could automatically raise an exception if the sequence lengths are different? If there's really a need for a zip that just truncates, maybe that could be moved to itertools? I think the equal-length scenario is dramatically more common, and keeping that error from passing silently would be a good thing IMHO. [1] http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2006-March/000160.html [2] http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2006-August/003094.html Steve -- I'm not *in*-sane. Indeed, I am so far *out* of sane that you appear a tiny blip on the distant coast of sanity. --- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
