On 9/4/06, David Hopwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
> I would prefer that there is no default. But since that is incompatible
> with the existing API for open(), I accept that I'm not likely to win
> that argument.
First, can you outline how the proposal of no default is incompatible
with the existing API for open?
print open("Documents/foo.py").encoding
Second: the whole IO library is being overhauled. How can backwards
compatibility be an issue?
Paul Prescod
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
