-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sep 19, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:
> Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I don't see how that helps. I can remove all references to the >> object but I still have to wait until gc runs to free it. Can you >> explain your idea in more detail? > > Objects which should be closed deterministically have the closing > action decoupled from the lifetime of the object. They are closed > explicitly; the object in a "closed" state doesn't take up any > sensitive resources. It's not external resources I'm concerned about, it's the physical memory consumed in process by objects which are unreachable but not reclaimed. - -Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBRRAUdXEjvBPtnXfVAQKFuQP9HmWucjJ//dTiEnEmjCgLNDbFF1J12c5U KwZAbBZw0CFjtZXCF9/cGuZ+KWROJGIB7A6YnqqmuIXhJ82t6Qmvm257pvQkWe/5 HmZbLCPoGKzmL33ince2f5gLxqKzl90B2L24TLlEYvrfOS9KTe2ree3HJXmyuRz3 471OBzViVAA= =WhVp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
