Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Ivan Krstić schrieb: >> 1) Having a large, canonical repository of useful Python code that's >> much more encompassing than Cheeseshop would be a good thing for Python. > > It's probably due to deficiencies in my mastering of the English > language: What do you mean by "encompassing" here? > > If you are requesting that all Python software in the world should > be listed in a canonical repository, I say that the Cheeseshop *is* > that canonical repository. If some package isn't listed, it's the > "fault" of the author of the package and its users, not the fault > of the Cheeseshop. I can't see how a *different* repository could > have any chance of becoming canonical.
Agreed - I don't have any problems with Cheeseshop as it exists today. -- Talin _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
