On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Neil Toronto wrote: > Is there any particular reason this *must* be a Py3k PEP? (Aside from > the fact that we're discussing it on the Py3k list, of course.) Some of > the solutions discussed for historical context would *definitely* be bad > ideas for a 2.x (as would changing the semantics of 'global'), but I > can't see why the solution proposed in the PEP couldn't be done sooner.
Well, i guess that's true. It doesn't seem out of the question for 2.x. -- ?!ng _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
