George Sakkis wrote: > Seems like a classic case for OOP to me: combine state (iterables) > with behavior (iter) in handly little packets (objects).
Except that it's not really behaviour. Chaining, e.g., is something you do *to* iterators, not something that the iterators themselves do. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
