> Non-duck typing is a seriously bad idea, forced > on some other languages by static typing.
Static != non-duck. One could imagine static duck typing (is it the same as structural typing?) with type inference. I wonder if some existing languages have static duck typing (boo? haskell?). _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
