George Sakkis wrote: >> (and I completely disagree that Mike's observation is moot: consistency >> is a fundamental part of Python's design, and mechanisms that helps >> people keep their code consistent without even noticing is an important >> part of why things are that way.) > > Striving for consistency without enforcing interfaces seems self defeating.
seems to, perhaps, but Python's been around for a quite some time by now. if the approach didn't work, we'd probably noticed by now. </F> _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
