[Talin:] > > With multiple dispatch, its easy to spell out what will happen in each > > possible permutation of arguments - and if you get an ambiguity, the > > dispatcher will let you know about it, instead of simply choosing an > > implementation arbitrarily.
[George Sakkis:] > Interesting idea, certainly not mainstream for the moment though. (Who cares whether it's "mainstream"? For what it's worth, the idea has been around for decades.) > Short question: how do multiple dispatch systems deal with the > combinatorial explosion ? I guess there should be a way to avoid > having to spell out all combinations every time, or it will soon be > unpractical. What combinatorial explosion? If you restrict yourself to what can be expressed in a traditional single-dispatch OO system, there is no combinatorial explosion; the complexity is no greater than for single dispatch. Multiple dispatch allows you to express much more. Some versions of "much more" would involve defining an enormous number of methods, but that's no more a problem with multiple dispatch than the fact that multidimensional arrays can use a huge amount of memory is a problem with multidimensional arrays. -- g _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
