On 11/22/06, Andrew Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Both 'ability' and 'interface' imply (to me, anyway) that the class
> > being inspected is an actor, that it 'does something' rather than being
> > operated on.
>
> I chose 'ability' because to me it doesn't require that the class being
> inspected is active by itself. For example, it feels natural to me to speak
> of a class as "having the totally ordered ability".
>From a linguistic point of view, "having the totally ordered property"
seems more natural and, more generally, captures better both active
("does something") and passive ("is [a description of] something")
concepts, but...
> The problem I have with 'feature' is that it's already in widespread use
> without a formal meaning.
Even worse, "property" has already a (different) formal meaning in
python, so I guess that's not an option (unless someone can come up
with a better name for existing properties _and_ convince that the
backwards incompatible name change is not a show-stopper).
George
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
