Greg Ewing wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> The deficiencies of email shouldn't be dictating the language.
>
> The interpreter prompt is hardly part of the language,
Except that the doctest module and the prevalence of interactive prompt
snippets in the documentation mean that it *is* effectively part of at least
the standard library, even if not the language proper.
> and I don't think it would be unreasonable to make a
> small change here to avoid unnecessarily conflicting
> with a well-established convention (I wouldn't call
> it a "deficiency").
True, but the workaround to align the two conventions if you work with email a
lot (i.e., including "sys.ps1 = '.>>> '" or similar in your PYTHONSTARTUP
script) is simple enough that it just doesn't seem worth the hassle of
changing all the doctests and various other bits of documentation to reflect a
new default interactive prompt.
All a somewhat moot discussion though, given that Guido has explicitly stated
that *he* wants to leave it alone, and he wins as the BDFL* :)
Cheers,
Nick.
*Bikeshed Discussion Finishing Leader, perhaps? ;)
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
